S.S Legal Guidance and Deviant Consulting

Part 2- The Smuggling Syndicate: Unpacking South Africa’s Illicit Tobacco Trade

South Africa’s black market for tobacco is a highly organised operation, shaped by economic pressures, consumer demand, and systemic corruption. In this article, I delve deeper into the factors sustaining this illicit trade, focusing on economic incentives, operational mechanisms, and the organised networks that dominate this shadow industry.  

The Economics of Smuggling: How the Tobacco Trade Thrives

 

Impact of Taxation

The South African government has adopted high excise duties on tobacco products as part of its public health strategy, aiming to discourage smoking. However, this policy has inadvertently created a fertile ground for black market activity. The increase in legal cigarette prices drives demand for cheaper, untaxed alternatives. For example, a pack of legal cigarettes can cost over R40, while illicit brands are available for as little as R10-R15. The affordability of black-market cigarettes is a key driver, especially in low-income communities where legitimate brands are financially out of reach. A report by PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) estimates that South Africa loses between R8 billion and R10 billion annually in unpaid tobacco taxes. This revenue gap undermines essential public services such as healthcare and education, highlighting the societal cost of illicit trade.  

Parallel Economy

This unregulated trade has become so entrenched that it operates almost like a parallel economy. Manufacturers of illicit cigarettes generate substantial profits by bypassing taxes and regulations. These profits are then reinvested into other criminal ventures, including drug trafficking and money laundering, compounding the economic and social impact on the country.  

Key Smuggling Routes and Operations

 

Beitbridge Border: A Smuggler’s Highway

The Beitbridge border post between South Africa and Zimbabwe is notorious for its role in tobacco smuggling. The geography of this region, combined with insufficient surveillance and corrupt practices, makes it a critical entry point for illicit cigarettes. Smugglers use hidden compartments in cargo trucks, small boats, and even individuals carrying contraband across less monitored sections of the border. A 2021 investigation by Amabhungane revealed a network of customs officers receiving bribes to allow these shipments to pass undetected. Trucks carrying tobacco products are frequently labelled as carrying non-suspicious goods such as maize or textiles, making it difficult for authorities to spot illegal activity without detailed inspections.  

Urban Distribution Networks

Once inside the country, illicit cigarettes are distributed through sprawling informal trade networks. Major cities like Johannesburg, Durban, and Cape Town act as hubs for distribution. From there, smaller networks ensure that these products reach rural areas where law enforcement presence is minimal. Informal traders, spaza shops, and street vendors often serve as the final point of sale. This decentralised distribution system makes it challenging for authorities to track and dismantle the networks. Each link in the chain operates semi-independently, ensuring the syndicate’s overall resilience even when individuals are caught.  

The Role of Big Players: Organised Crime Networks

 

The Multinational Nexus

The illicit tobacco trade is not just a local problem but a transnational issue involving organised crime networks. In neighbouring countries like Zimbabwe and Mozambique, factories produce counterfeit or untaxed cigarettes at a fraction of the cost of legitimate production. These cigarettes are then smuggled into South Africa, exploiting porous borders and weak enforcement. A 2019 case involving the Gold Leaf Tobacco Corporation exposed the role of legitimate-seeming companies in facilitating illicit trade. Allegations included underreporting production volumes to avoid taxes and direct involvement in smuggling operations. Such cases highlight the blurred lines between legal and illegal tobacco markets.  

Local Syndicates and Corruption

On the ground, local crime syndicates collaborate with corrupt officials to ensure smooth operations. Bribery of police, border officials, and customs officers is a routine expense for these syndicates. This institutional corruption allows smuggling to continue with little fear of prosecution. For instance, in 2022, several SARS (South African Revenue Service) officials were arrested for their involvement in tobacco smuggling, demonstrating the scale of infiltration within enforcement agencies.

 

The Broader Impacts of Illicit Tobacco

 

Public Health Risks

Illicit cigarettes are often manufactured without adhering to safety or quality standards, posing significant health risks to consumers. High levels of harmful substances such as tar and nicotine are common, as counterfeit producers cut corners to maximise profits. This undermines public health campaigns aimed at reducing smoking-related illnesses.  

Economic Inequality

The black market disproportionately affects the poor, both as consumers and participants in the supply chain. Informal traders often turn to selling illicit cigarettes as a means of survival, perpetuating their entanglement in illegal activities. Meanwhile, the state loses billions in potential tax revenue that could alleviate poverty and inequality.  

Erosion of State Authority

The proliferation of the illicit tobacco trade erodes public trust in the state’s ability to enforce laws and regulate commerce. As criminal networks grow bolder, they challenge the legitimacy of law enforcement and tax collection agencies.  

 A Call to Action

The illicit tobacco trade in South Africa is a microcosm of broader societal challenges, including corruption, economic inequality, and weak governance. Tackling this issue requires a multi-pronged approach:  

  1. Stronger Border Control: Increased investment in technology and personnel at key border posts like Beitbridge.
  2. Anti-Corruption Measures: Enhanced transparency and accountability within customs and law enforcement agencies.
  3. Economic Interventions: Reducing excise duties on tobacco could shrink the price gap between legal and illegal products, cutting demand for black-market cigarettes.

  Without decisive action, the illicit tobacco industry will continue to thrive, draining the country of vital resources and perpetuating cycles of crime and inequality.  

Sources and Further Reading

 

  1. Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime – Regional Reports on Illicit Trade.
  2. Tobacco Institute of South Africa (TISA).
  3. SARS Annual Report 2022 (Public Record).
  4. Amabhungane investigative articles on corruption in customs.
  5. PricewaterhouseCoopers Report on Illicit Trade in South Africa.
  6. Corruption Watch Reports on Bribery at South African Borders (www.corruptionwatch.org.za).
  7. UNODC Insights into Organised Crime in Southern Africa.

 

Part 1: Echoes in the Abyss—Mapping South Africa’s Shadow Economies

 

The Shadow Veins of South Africa

South Africa’s shadow economies act as hidden arteries of economic activity, fuelled by desperation, inequality, and systemic neglect. They encompass a range of illegal and semi-legal activities, from illegal mining (Zama Zamas) to counterfeit markets and global smuggling networks. These markets thrive due to governance failures, corruption, and socio-economic exclusion, forming a cycle of dependency for those trapped within. This serves as the gateway to understanding how these shadow systems function as both symptoms and causes of broader societal issues. It establishes the duality of shadow economies: a refuge for the vulnerable and a playground for exploiters.  

Section 1: “Fools’ Gold”—Unveiling the Zama Zama Economy

 

Mechanics of the Trade

Zama Zamas represent the most visible and tragic aspect of illegal mining. These miners target abandoned mines that are no longer maintained or regulated, exposing themselves to cave-ins, toxic gas leaks, and chemical contamination. Their operations are crude but interconnected with global black markets. The gold extracted is laundered through various methods, such as being falsely declared as recycled gold or blended with legally mined gold before being exported. This process often involves a chain of middlemen, corrupt officials, and international buyers who exploit legal loopholes, particularly around VAT and customs regulations. The term Zama Zama translates loosely to “try your luck,” highlighting the precarious nature of their work and the lack of alternatives. These miners gamble their lives for the chance to escape poverty, but the profits overwhelmingly flow upward to criminal syndicates and corrupt officials.

 

What This Means

Illegal mining is not just a crime; it is an economic and human rights issue. It reflects the absence of safety nets for marginalised individuals and the failure of the state to regulate valuable natural resources effectively. For the broader economy, the loss of tax revenue and the environmental destruction caused by unregulated mining are substantial setbacks.  

Section 2: The Syndicate Nexus—Webs of Organised Crime

 

Interconnection with Other Black Markets

Illegal mining syndicates do not operate in isolation. They often have overlapping interests in counterfeit markets, drug trafficking, and human smuggling. For instance, counterfeit goods such as textiles, electronics, and cosmetics have been used to launder money from illegal mining operations. These goods are sold openly in urban hubs, with profits reinvested into mining equipment or weapons for territorial control. Armed groups within the Zama Zama network frequently clash over mining territories, resulting in violence that destabilises nearby communities. This violence is not random; it is a calculated strategy to maintain control over resources and labour. Syndicates enforce strict hierarchies within their operations, mirroring the dynamics of cartel systems seen globally.  

What This Means

These interconnections highlight how deeply shadow economies penetrate legitimate systems. Syndicates exploit legal frameworks, such as the informal trade sector, to conceal their activities. This complexity makes enforcement challenging and allows shadow economies to embed themselves into the fabric of society.
  

Section 3: Governance Gaps—Why the State Fails

 

Systemic Failures

South Africa’s regulatory framework around mining and trade has significant gaps. For example, the South African Diamond and Precious Metals Regulator (SADPMR) lacks the resources to monitor gold transactions effectively. Additionally, overlapping jurisdictions between law enforcement agencies create confusion and inefficiency, enabling syndicates to exploit these weaknesses. Corruption is a critical factor in the perpetuation of shadow economies. Investigative reports have documented cases of police officers and officials accepting bribes to overlook illegal mining activities or actively participating in the operations. This creates a culture of impunity where syndicates operate openly, knowing enforcement is unlikely. Unemployment and inequality are the root causes driving individuals toward illegal mining and related activities. According to strain theory, when legitimate means to achieve economic stability are blocked, individuals turn to alternative paths, even if they are illegal. This phenomenon is especially pronounced in marginalised communities with limited access to education and formal employment.  

What This Means

The state’s inability to enforce regulations and address systemic inequality is the foundation on which shadow economies thrive. Corruption erodes trust in public institutions, leaving communities vulnerable to exploitation by criminal syndicates.  

Section 4: The Ripple Effect—Social and Economic Costs

 

Impact on Communities

Communities near abandoned mines often become collateral damage in the zama zama economy. Women and children are disproportionately affected, facing exploitation and violence as syndicates establish dominance in these areas. Environmental degradation, such as groundwater contamination and deforestation, further exacerbates poverty and health risks. Illegal mining costs the state billions in lost revenue annually. Beyond immediate losses, it damages South Africa’s reputation as a global mining hub, deterring legitimate investment. For communities, the economic cost includes the destruction of local infrastructure and the loss of potential formal-sector employment opportunities.  

What This Means

The societal costs of shadow economies extend far beyond their immediate participants. They destabilise communities, strain public resources, and undermine economic growth. Addressing these issues requires a multi-faceted approach that goes beyond enforcement to include social and economic interventions.  

A Society Held Hostage

South Africa’s shadow economies are deeply entrenched, sustained by systemic inequality, governance failures, and corruption. From the zama zama networks in abandoned mines to the interconnected web of counterfeit markets and smuggling, these systems represent a significant threat to the country’s stability.  

Sources and References

  1. Council for Geoscience
  • Reports on South Africa’s abandoned mines and the impact of illegal mining.

 

  1. Daily Maverick
  • Investigative reports on Zama Zama operations and organised crime connections.

 

  1. African Law Business Journal
  • Analyses on counterfeit markets and governance issues.

 

  1. Mail & Guardian
  • Case studies on corruption and community impacts of shadow economies.

 

  1. South African Police Services (SAPS)
  • Crime statistics and reports on syndicate activities.

 

  1. FATF (Financial Action Task Force)
  • Insights into global money laundering in the gold sector.

 

  1. Merton, R. K. (1938). Social Structure and Anomie.
  • Foundational work on strain theory and its application to illegal activities.

 

  1. Environmental Impact Studies on Mining
  • Reports on environmental degradation caused by unregulated mining activities.

 

Celebrating Loving, Protective Mothers: A Deep Dive into Positive Parenting

Parenting is a multifaceted journey, and the role of a mother as a loving, protective caregiver is fundamental to a child’s development. By looking at this through an academic lens, we can uncover the psychological, emotional, and societal impacts of positive parenting practices. This article breaks down the science behind secure attachment, positive discipline, and co-parenting to understand how these factors shape the lives of children and the well-being of families.  

The Lifeline of Secure Attachment

Academic Definition

Secure attachment is a foundational concept from attachment theory, developed by John Bowlby. It refers to a strong, emotional bond between a child and their primary caregiver, formed through consistent and responsive caregiving. Securely attached children view their caregivers as a source of safety, enabling them to explore the world confidently.

What Does This Mean?

When a child develops secure attachment, their brain forms pathways that regulate emotions and stress responses. This bond fosters a sense of stability and trust, which is critical during early brain development, especially between ages 0-5. Children with secure attachment tend to perform better academically, exhibit lower levels of anxiety, and maintain healthier relationships throughout life.

Neuroscience Perspective

Research shows that secure attachment activates the limbic system, the emotional centre of the brain. When caregivers consistently soothe and comfort their child, the child’s brain learns to self-regulate emotions like fear and sadness. Without this, the amygdala (responsible for fear responses) can become overactive, increasing susceptibility to mental health issues.

Implications for Society

In communities facing socio-economic challenges, secure attachment becomes even more critical. Children who lack stable caregiving environments are more likely to struggle with emotional regulation and form insecure attachments, which can perpetuate cycles of poverty and instability. By promoting responsive caregiving, society can equip the next generation with tools to break these cycles.  

The Framework of Positive Parenting

What Is Positive Parenting?

Positive parenting is a research-backed approach focused on fostering nurturing relationships, establishing consistent boundaries, and guiding children with empathy rather than punishment. This method combines psychological principles of behaviourism, emotional intelligence, and developmental psychology.

Key Elements of Positive Parenting

  1. Empathy and Emotional Availability

Positive parenting prioritises understanding a child’s emotions and teaching them how to process these feelings. For instance, instead of reprimanding a child for crying, a parent may say, “I see you’re upset; let’s talk about what’s bothering you.” This teaches children emotional regulation and empathy.

  1. Consistency in Discipline

Consistent boundaries provide children with predictability, which fosters a sense of security. Discipline in this framework isn’t punitive but corrective, helping children understand the consequences of their actions without shame or fear. For example, using timeouts or logical consequences, such as losing privileges, can be effective.

  1. Encouragement Over Criticism

Positive reinforcement, such as praising effort instead of results, motivates children to build resilience and self-confidence. It aligns with the psychological principle that behaviour rewarded is likely to be repeated, reinforcing desired habits.

Developmental Benefits

Studies show that children raised with positive parenting exhibit higher self-esteem, better problem-solving skills, and stronger social bonds. This approach reduces behavioural issues by focusing on collaboration rather than control.  

The Importance of Co-Parenting in Child Development

Defining Co-Parenting

Co-parenting refers to the collaborative effort of two parents (or caregivers) to raise a child. This includes shared responsibilities in decision-making, caregiving, and emotional support. Research highlights that co-parenting fosters a balanced family environment, benefiting children emotionally and psychologically.

Psychological Impact

From a child’s perspective, co-parenting demonstrates healthy relationship dynamics. Children observe how parents manage disagreements, compromise, and work as a team. This modelling teaches them conflict resolution and communication skills.

Challenges and Solutions

In cases of divorce or separation, effective co-parenting can be difficult. Strategies like open communication, mutual respect, and mediation help reduce conflict. For instance, research from South Africa suggests that co-parenting arrangements focusing on the child’s needs lead to better outcomes than adversarial custody battles.

My insights

Having worked on numerous court-appointed divorces as a paralegal, I’ve gained significant experience in guiding clients through the often-difficult process of creating parenting plans and co-parenting strategies. Divorce can be emotionally charged and messy, but the importance of these plans cannot be overstated. A well-structured parenting plan helps minimise conflict and ensures that children’s best interests are prioritised, which can be seen in their academic performance and behaviour. When parents struggle to communicate, co-parenting strategies can help them find common ground for their children’s well-being. It’s crucial to explain the divorce process to children in a way that suits their understanding, addressing their fears and concerns. Understanding that their parents’ separation is not their fault and that both parents are committed to their well-being can make a huge difference. A parenting plan is more than just a legal document, it’s a tool for fostering a healthy environment where children can thrive despite the changes in their family structure.  

The Role of Modelling in Behavioural Development

What Is Behavioural Modelling?

Children are like sponges, absorbing the behaviours, attitudes, and emotional responses of those around them. Behavioural modelling, a concept rooted in social learning theory (Bandura, 1977), posits that children learn by observing and imitating adults.

Application in Parenting

Parents who demonstrate patience, empathy, and resilience indirectly teach their children these values. For example, a mother who remains calm during a stressful situation teaches her child that challenges can be managed without aggression.

Theoretical Framework

Bandura’s famous Bobo Doll Experiment illustrated how children imitate both positive and negative behaviours. If a child sees a parent handling conflicts calmly, they are more likely to adopt constructive problem-solving methods. Conversely, witnessing aggressive behaviour increases the likelihood of the child developing similar tendencies.

Long-Term Implications

Behavioural modelling lays the groundwork for moral development and social skills. In South African contexts, where societal stressors like unemployment and crime may affect family dynamics, positive behavioural modelling is especially crucial. Parents who demonstrate resilience can instil hope and determination in their children.  

Honouring the Role of Mothers

The role of a loving, protective mother is unparalleled in shaping not only individual lives but also the fabric of society. Secure attachment, positive parenting, and behavioural modelling are not just psychological theories but real, impactful practices that empower children to thrive. Parenting, while deeply challenging, is one of the most rewarding roles. For mothers striving to provide love and protection, their efforts are the foundation upon which future generations stand. By supporting these mothers (through education, community initiatives, and accessible resources) we can ensure a brighter, healthier future for all.  

References

  1. Bowlby, J. (1988). A Secure Base: Parent-Child Attachment and Healthy Human Development.
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory.
  3. UNICEF South Africa. (2022). The Role of Responsive Caregiving in Building Resilient Communities.
  4. South African Child Gauge. (2019). Children’s Access to Services and Support.
  5. Khayelitsha Study on Mental Health and Attachment. (2021).
  6. University of Pretoria. (2020). Parenting Practices and Their Impact on Child Outcomes in South Africa.

 

Part 3: The Psychology and Profiling Behind Mothers Who Abuse and Kill Their Children

The reasons why a mother would abuse or even kill her child are some of the most unsettling topics in psychological and criminological research. Maternal violence challenges society’s deeply held beliefs about motherhood, that mothers are inherently nurturing, loving, and selfless. Cases of maternal abuse and filicide (the act of a parent killing their child) disrupt these ideals and often leave families and communities searching for answers.
What drives a mother to act against the natural protective instincts expected in motherhood? In South Africa, high-profile cases where mothers have been involved in serious abuse, or the tragic deaths of their children have sparked public outrage and a need to understand the forces behind these actions. The motivations and psychological complexities are often multi-layered, involving trauma, mental health issues, socio-economic struggles, and sometimes social or cultural pressures that push these women to behave in ways they themselves may not fully understand.  

Understanding the Underlying Causes of Maternal Abuse

Maternal abuse does not emerge in a vacuum; it is usually the result of a combination of personal trauma, untreated mental health issues, and socio-economic pressures. A significant number of abusive mothers come from abusive backgrounds, perpetuating what researchers call a “cycle of violence.” Childhood trauma, especially if it involved neglect or abuse from one’s own parents, can leave deep scars, affecting emotional regulation, self-worth, and perceptions of relationships. These women may carry unresolved trauma into adulthood, which distorts their view of their children. In South Africa, where generational trauma is exacerbated by socio-economic inequalities, these dynamics are often even more pronounced. When mothers lack the support or resources needed to heal from their own traumas, they may unintentionally project unresolved emotions onto their children, seeing in them a painful reminder of their own past.

Mental health disorders play a substantial role in cases of maternal abuse. Depression, bipolar disorder, borderline personality disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are conditions that can undermine a mother’s ability to cope with stress, connect empathetically with her child, or regulate her emotions effectively. Depression, for example, can lead to withdrawal and neglect, creating an emotionally barren environment for the child. In more severe cases, mental illness can alter a mother’s perception of reality or impair her judgement, leading to behaviours that range from neglect to outright violence. Borderline personality disorder (BPD), characterised by unstable relationships, intense emotional responses, and impulsive actions, can create challenges for mothers who struggle to maintain a consistent, nurturing bond with their children.

Economic strain is another powerful contributor to maternal abuse, particularly in a country like South Africa, where poverty and unemployment rates are high. When basic needs go unmet, stress levels rise, and patience dwindles. Financial stress, lack of access to support systems, and the constant struggle to provide can make mothers feel hopeless, often leading to frustration that manifests as verbal or physical abuse toward children. Studies have shown that mothers facing extreme poverty are at a higher risk of resorting to aggression or neglect, especially when they feel there is no relief or end in sight to their struggles. Substance abuse further compounds these issues. Addiction, often a way to cope with overwhelming stress or mental health challenges, lowers self-control and increases irritability, making abusive behaviour more likely. In some South African communities, substance abuse is a pervasive issue, especially in areas with limited access to mental health support and addiction treatment services. Mothers struggling with addiction may become neglectful or even violent toward their children, particularly if they are under the influence and have diminished capacity to control their anger.  

Psychological Pathways to Filicide: When Abuse Escalates to Killing

The escalation from abuse to filicide represents a severe psychological breakdown, with layers of distress and dysfunction pushing a mother to commit what society views as the ultimate betrayal. Several psychological pathways may lead a mother to kill her child, each with its own underlying motivations and psychological dynamics. Understanding these pathways requires an examination of the severe psychological distress these mothers often experience. One of the more disturbing motivations is termed “altruistic” filicide, where a mother believes that ending her child’s life is a form of mercy or protection. This type of filicide is often associated with severe mental health disorders, such as psychotic depression or schizophrenia, where reality is distorted, and the mother may genuinely believe that her child would suffer more by living. In these cases, the mother may perceive the world as an overwhelmingly hostile place and think she is sparing her child from inevitable harm.

South Africa has had instances where mothers facing desperate financial conditions, abuse, or mental health crises have killed their children out of a belief that they were saving them from a lifetime of suffering. These cases highlight the importance of accessible mental health resources, as untreated mental illness is often the primary factor in such decisions. Another psychological pathway is “acutely psychotic” filicide, where severe mental illness clouds the mother’s perception to the point where she may believe her child is evil, possessed, or somehow a threat. This type of filicide is rare but profoundly tragic, as it typically involves mothers who are detached from reality. For example, a mother suffering from untreated psychosis may experience hallucinations or delusional beliefs that lead her to view her child as dangerous or contaminated. South Africa’s healthcare system, which often struggles to meet mental health demands due to limited resources, may lack the ability to identify and treat these conditions before they escalate into violence.

Filicide can also stem from revenge-driven motives. In some cases, mothers in abusive relationships may feel trapped, angry, and powerless, especially if their abuser exerts control over them through their children. For these mothers, killing their child becomes a twisted assertion of control, an act meant to hurt their abusive partner in the most devastating way possible. These cases are perhaps the most challenging to understand, as they reflect deep-seated resentment and a breakdown in the maternal role, driven by feelings of betrayal and a desire for vengeance. When mothers feel helpless within their own relationships, they may turn to filicide as a way to regain some sense of agency, albeit through profoundly destructive means.  

Why Adoption Is Often Not Considered

In situations where filicide occurs, outsiders may wonder why these mothers did not consider giving their children up for adoption rather than resorting to extreme violence. However, the decision-making process in these cases is far from straightforward, and adoption is rarely seen as a viable option for several reasons. For one, cultural and societal beliefs around family loyalty and parental duty play a significant role in influencing a mother’s choices. In many South African communities, there is a stigma associated with adoption, seen as a “giving up” of one’s responsibilities as a mother.

This can be especially true in cultures where family and blood ties are paramount, and raising a child, even in hardship, is viewed as an obligation. For mothers grappling with mental illness or psychological distress, the stigma surrounding adoption may feel insurmountable, pushing them further into isolation and leaving them with no perceived options. Furthermore, the bond between a mother and her child can be conflicted but profoundly strong. Psychologists describe a phenomenon called “ambivalent attachment,” in which a mother feels both love and resentment toward her child. This ambivalence can make the idea of adoption feel like a betrayal, even if keeping the child is detrimental. In cases of ambivalent attachment, a mother may feel simultaneously possessive and frustrated, unable to let go yet struggling to cope.

When faced with overwhelming emotions, these mothers may resort to drastic measures rather than relinquishing their child to another family. Domestic violence can also be a critical factor. For mothers who are in abusive relationships, giving up a child for adoption may feel impossible if the abuser uses the child to control her. In these situations, the child becomes a pawn in a complex dynamic of power, manipulation, and fear. Trapped between conflicting desires, the mother may feel that she has no other option but to resort to extreme actions, viewing filicide as a tragic but definitive solution.  

The Intersection of Trauma, Mental Illness, and Social Pressure

Exploring the psychological pathways that lead mothers to abuse or kill their children is complex, with each case reflecting a unique set of personal, social, and psychological influences. Maternal violence is often the result of cumulative factors, including unaddressed trauma, mental health disorders, economic hardship, and cultural beliefs. The high-profile cases in South Africa that involve maternal abuse or filicide reveal not only the struggles individual mothers face but also the broader societal challenges that exacerbate these risks. Preventing such tragedies requires a multi-faceted approach, one that includes access to mental health care, social support, early intervention, and education around positive parenting practices. Community awareness and destigmatisation of mental health treatment can play a vital role in offering mothers support before their struggles reach a crisis point. Breaking cycles of violence is a societal responsibility, requiring not only intervention but compassion for the complex factors that can drive mothers to make unimaginable choices.  

Sources:

  1. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. Transaction Publishers.
  2. Spinelli, M. G. (2004). Maternal infanticide associated with mental illness: Prevention and the promise of saved lives. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161(9), 1548-1557.
  3. Friedman, S. H., & Resnick, P. J. (2007). Child murder by mothers: Patterns and prevention. World Psychiatry, 6(3), 137-141.
  4. Liem, M., & Koenraadt, F. (2008). Filicide: A comparative study of maternal versus paternal child homicide. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 18(3), 166-176.
  5. Krug, E. G., Dahlberg, L. L., Mercy, J. A., Zwi, A. B., & Lozano, R. (2002). World report on violence and health. World Health Organization.


I want to close this blog with a clear message—I am in no way condoning or supporting maternal abuse or filicide. My intention is simply to share my thoughts and extend support to mothers who may be struggling, to offer help before things spiral to a breaking point. We live in a society where ignorance and loud opinions often drown out the real struggles faced by first-time mothers. Sometimes, all a mother truly needs is a safe space to vent and release stress, without being pressured to change or take drastic steps.

 

Part 2: The Complex Psychology of Maternal Abandonment

While society often reveres the ideal of maternal love, some mothers deviate from this expectation in ways that are challenging to understand. One of the most difficult situations to grasp is maternal abandonment, where a mother leaves her child either emotionally, physically, or both. The psychology behind maternal abandonment is multifaceted, involving a complex interplay of personal history, mental health issues, socio-economic pressures, and sometimes trauma, which can be as varied and intricate as the phenomenon of motherhood itself. What drives a mother to abandon her child? Is it as simple as a lack of love? Understanding this requires a deep look at the internal and external forces at play. Could the society do more to support these mothers and their children?  

In psychological terms, maternal abandonment does not necessarily mean a lack of love for the child but often indicates underlying factors that overwhelm the mother’s ability to care and connect. A foundational concept here is attachment theory, which suggests that early childhood relationships shape one’s ability to form secure connections later in life. If a mother experienced neglect, abuse, or abandonment during her own childhood, could this history make it harder for her to build a strong emotional bond with her child? For mothers who abandon their children, it’s common to find a history of disrupted or traumatic attachments.
d According to attachment theory, people who lacked secure bonds in their own childhood may struggle to offer those bonds to their children. Studies suggest that mothers with insecure attachment histories, especially those marked by neglect, abuse, or abandonment themselves, are more likely to experience challenges in forming healthy connections with their children. These early experiences create a foundation that may hinder a mother’s emotional resilience, making the demands of parenthood feel insurmountable. But here’s the real question: how much responsibility should society bear for creating a cycle where these mothers never receive the emotional support they need? What can we do to change this?  

From a socio-economic perspective, maternal abandonment is also frequently linked to poverty and a lack of resources. In South Africa, where many families face economic hardship, mothers may feel unable to meet their children’s needs despite their desires to care for them. The World Bank highlights that economic inequality in South Africa remains one of the highest in the world, with a considerable proportion of the population living in poverty. For some mothers, the relentless struggle to provide basic necessities can create a profound sense of inadequacy and despair, leading them to believe that their children would be better off without them.
This belief can be compounded by the stigma associated with poverty, where mothers may face judgment or shame for their inability to fulfil traditional maternal roles. In these cases, abandonment can be seen as an act of “perceived mercy”, a desperate attempt to offer the child a chance at a better life with someone more capable. But is this belief, understood and addressed by society? Instead of judgment, shouldn’t we as a community focus on providing support to break these cycles?  

Mental health issues, particularly depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), play a significant role in maternal abandonment. Research shows that mothers dealing with mental health challenges may struggle to engage in the bonding and nurturing behaviours typically associated with motherhood. For instance, postnatal depression can make it difficult for a mother to respond to her child’s needs, leading to feelings of guilt, hopelessness, and detachment. PTSD, often stemming from traumatic experiences like abuse, violence, or loss, can trigger avoidant behaviours as mothers may be unable to cope with the emotional intensity required for parenting.
How often do we acknowledge the profound emotional toll that these conditions take on mothers? South African research indicates that mental health resources are often limited in underprivileged communities, leaving many mothers without access to the support needed to manage these conditions. In such circumstances, a mother may retreat from her child, not out of a lack of love, but as a protective measure against what feels like an insurmountable emotional burden. Should we not be asking: where are the mental health resources for these mothers, and why are they so inaccessible? Especially when these mothers are the foundation of our future generation.  

Cultural expectations around motherhood also contribute to the phenomenon of maternal abandonment. South African society, like many others, holds strong ideals about the role of a mother, often portraying her as self-sacrificing, nurturing, and always present. But what happens when a mother can’t meet these expectations? (whether due to personal challenges, socio-economic constraints, or psychological struggles) the sense of failure can be profound. Some mothers internalise societal shame to the extent that they see themselves as unworthy or incapable of parenting, pushing them toward abandonment as a way to escape perceived inadequacy. In some cases, these societal pressures are compounded by family dynamics where the responsibility of child-rearing is offloaded to extended family members, leading to the marginalisation of the biological mother. As a result, the act of abandonment can sometimes be seen less as a personal failure and more as a social failure, with mothers becoming casualties of unyielding cultural norms.  

Trauma also frequently emerges as a recurring theme in the profiles of mothers who abandon their children. For example, mothers who were victims of abuse, whether in childhood or adulthood, may experience “re-traumatisation” through the act of caregiving. Caring for a child, particularly one in early development, requires physical closeness, emotional vulnerability, and an investment of trust all elements that can be challenging for trauma survivors. For some, the psychological toll of parenting in the face of unresolved trauma becomes unbearable, leading them to abandon their children as a form of self-preservation. The Trauma and Resilience Research Centre in South Africa emphasises that intergenerational trauma (trauma passed from one generation to the next) can play a role in maternal abandonment, where mothers replicate patterns of detachment as a coping mechanism, not fully aware of the origins of their own struggles.  

The decision to abandon a child is rarely one-dimensional and often involves intense internal conflict. For some mothers, the choice may be an agonising one made under the weight of circumstances beyond their control. Research indicates that the majority of mothers who abandon their children do so with a degree of regret and sorrow, feeling they have no viable alternative. In South Africa, where social services are stretched thin, options for struggling mothers may be limited, leaving them to make decisions based on survival rather than choice. Many face the painful reality that institutional or foster care might be the only viable option to provide for their children’s needs, even if it means separation.
This underscores the need for societal empathy and support systems that offer struggling mothers more options before abandonment becomes their only solution.   Abandonment does not mean a complete absence of love or concern. In fact, psychologists note that some mothers who abandon their children do so with the belief that they are acting in the child’s best interest, hoping to spare them from the hardships of their own lives. This perception aligns with the concept of “self-sacrificial” abandonment, where a mother consciously separates from her child because she believes that someone else can provide a better life. This form of abandonment can be particularly painful, as it requires a mother to confront her own limitations and failures, acknowledging that her love alone may not be enough to offer her child a stable future.  

The psychological consequences of maternal abandonment on children are significant, often leading to feelings of rejection, low self-worth, and trust issues that can persist into adulthood. Children who experience abandonment frequently struggle to understand why they were left behind, which can lead to questions of inherent worth and fears of being abandoned again. From a psychological standpoint, these experiences can disrupt a child’s ability to form secure attachments and may lead to behavioural and emotional issues later in life. Studies suggest that children who grow up feeling abandoned may also grapple with identity issues, often attempting to reconcile their sense of self-worth with the actions of their absent parent. This adds another layer of complexity, as maternal abandonment creates a cycle of emotional scars that can affect both the mother and her child, leaving lasting impressions on both lives.
One of the most striking aspects of maternal abandonment is that it is not always permanent. Some mothers, particularly those who abandoned their children out of dire necessity, later attempt to reconnect, hoping to mend broken bonds and offer explanations for their actions. The reconciliation process is rarely straightforward and often requires significant healing and emotional labour. In South Africa, organisations focused on family reunification emphasise the importance of providing counselling and support for both the mother and child, as rebuilding trust after abandonment is a sensitive and complex process. The pain caused by abandonment, though significant, can sometimes be transformed into a pathway for growth and understanding, but only if both parties are willing and supported in their journey.  


 The Village That Judges What has happened to the old saying, “It takes a village to raise a child”? The ideal of a supportive, collective effort to nurture children has been replaced by quick judgment and societal indifference. How can we, as a community, do better? How can we provide support to mothers with the help they need (emotional support or just being present) rather than judging them for their perceived failures? Isn’t it time we rethink the way we approach motherhood, offering empathy instead of shame? And, most importantly, how can we change the narrative that leaves mothers to fend for themselves, when a supportive community could make all the difference? The profiles of mothers who abandon their children highlight the challenges of reconciling societal ideals of motherhood with individual realities. While society may stigmatise these mothers, understanding the root causes of abandonment reveals that many are caught in situations beyond their control, forced to make decisions they never imagined. Through this lens, maternal abandonment becomes less an act of cruelty and more a tragic intersection of personal struggle, mental health, and social disadvantage. By examining maternal abandonment compassionately, we can broaden our understanding of motherhood to encompass its challenges as well as its ideals, recognising that every mother’s story is shaped by her unique circumstances, battles, and ultimately, her humanity.  

Sources:

  1. Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and Loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. Basic Books.
  2. Posel, D., & Devey, R. (2006). “The demographics of fatherhood in South Africa.” Human Sciences Research Council, 45(2), 36-49.
  3. Cooper, P. J., & Murray, L. (1998). “Postnatal depression and child development.” British Medical Bulletin, 54(4), 105-116.
  4. Wild, L. G., Flisher, A. J., Bhana, A., & Lombard, C. (2004). “Associations among adolescent risk behaviours and self-esteem in six domains.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(8), 1454-1460.
  5. Tomlinson, M., Cooper, P., & Swartz, L. (2004). “Post-partum depression and interactions in a South African peri-urban settlement.” Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 39(8), 620-625.
  6. World Bank. (2021). South Africa Economic Update: Focus on Inequality.
  7. Van der Merwe, A., & Dawes, A. (2000). “Structural violence and emotional health in South African children.” Developmental Psychology, 36(2), 329-337.
  8. Trauma and Resilience Research Centre, South Africa. (2023). Annual Report on Intergenerational Trauma in SA.

 

WhatsApp us